Huge Yes vote in local government pension strike ballot

Submitted by Janine on Wed, 15/03/2006 - 18:43.

Marching for pensions

From the Joint Union Strike Team (JUST)

MASSIVE STRIKE DAY LOOMING OVER CUTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSIONS

Over one million of the country's most essential public sector workers will go on strike on 28 March to protest at unfair and unjust cuts to local government pensions, the Joint Union Strike Team (JUST) announced today. The strike is planned because the Government refuses to give protection for existing members of their pension scheme.

Members of nine of the country's biggest unions have overwhelmingly voted "YES" to strike action because the Government and the Local Government Association refuse to pay out what they promised on the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS).

The Government wants to get rid of the Rule of 85, with only limited protection for existing members. LGPS members will have to keep working until they are 65, even though they have been paying 6% of their salary into the pension scheme and planning for their retirement for years.

Groups affected include home carers, refuse collectors, classroom assistants, library staff and other council workers plus police civilian staff, administrative staff in universities and colleges, the Environment Agency and many others.

Tony Rabaiotti, Head of Local Government for UNISON, West Midlands said:

"Over 80% of UNISON members voted in favour of this strike action to support LGPS members. By refusing to pay out on the LGPS, especially when they have given protection to every other government pension scheme, the Government has destroyed the retirement plans of tens of thousand of public sector workers.

"These essential public sector workers have had enough of being told they're to blame for rising council tax increases. LGPS pensions cost just 2.7 pence of the council tax pound, so don't be fooled into believing that these people are to blame.

"It is simply immoral that the employers' association doesn't come clean and admit that they have already spent the pension funds paid in good faith by LGPS members. This is a pensions con.

"Civil servants, teachers, police, firefighters and the NHS have all been given protection for existing members of their pension schemes, so there is absolutely no rhyme or reason in singling out LGPS members for such unfair and unjust treatment.

"The Government must extend the same protection to existing LGPS members that it has given to all other public sector workers. To continue to refuse to do so is unfair, unjust and inexplicable.

"Three quarters of LGPS members are women, who did exactly what the government told them and started paying for their retirement out of their earnings - and now because of the financial mismanagement of their employers, the rules get changed and they have to work an extra five years.

"After a lifetime of dedicated service to their local communities, our members deserve the pensions they have already paid for.

"We have been negotiating for months over this issue, and it is still not too late for the Government and the employers' association to sit down and talk sense.

"The latest figures from independent actuary Aon show small costs and huge savings for employers if protection for existing members is retained - and both the Government and LGA accept these findings."

=====

BALLOT RESULTS
As at Wednesday 15 March 2006

YES VOTE

  • AEP 76%

  • Amicus 90%
  • CYWU 72%
  • GMB 82%
  • Napo 87%
  • NIPSA 72%
  • T&G 80%
  • UCATT 90%
  • UNISON 80%
  • Average yes vote 81%

( categories: | | | | )